Why would anyone or any team contest a constituency? I believe some parties have different reasons from what I feel is the right reason. I believe that in contesting for a constituency, the most important priority and motivation is to represent the residents of that particular constituency.
If the MP is not elected to represent the people of a certain geographical location with varying profiles and needs, what is he or she elected for?
I understand that in Singapore, voting is party-based and not based on individuals. This means that voters must also consider what the party represents, on top of whether the candidate is suitable to address the needs of the constituency. Nevertheless, it does not make sense to me when a party contest a constituency because the party wishes to take issue with the incumbent’s portfolio in the cabinet. In other words, I believe one should not contest a constituency simply to give voters a chance to vote the incumbent out. The more mistaken motivation is to simply ‘let the people have a chance to vote’.
In the case of Tanjong Pagar GRC, the attempt to form a team just to allow the people to vote misses the point of what voting is for. Even if a formidable team is assembled, voters must also ask themselves why is the team here? Does the team understand our specific needs? Has the team been around to meet the people and to profile the area? Is the team able to help?
The same goes for SDP’s bid in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC and NSP’s efforts in Marine Parade GRC and Tampines GRC. To contest these GRCs so that the opposition has a chance to take aim at specific politicians and specific policies and to canvass for votes on the basis that certain incumbents should be voted out is really ignoring the equally real work that the MPs have put in to care for their residents.
I am not saying that SDP and NSP are there solely to pick on specific individuals but it appears to be the case. The constant reference for the desire to hold the ministers accountable and requests for them to answer for their decisions paints a picture that misrepresents the main aim of electing an MP. I am not saying that SDP and NSP are not interested in the welfare of the people in the constituency – I am certain they are - but I wish they would not portray their efforts as chiefly to vote out certain individuals for the national policies they represent.
As someone who feels that he is sorely outpriced in the HDB resale market and do not find the locations of BTOs appealing, of course I am concerned about the cost of public housing. As someone who thought the YOG was a success, I am also concerned over the reason for over-budgeting. Similarly, I find it shocking that someone could escape from a detention center and flee the country even as many units are tasked to comb Singapore for someone that has already left the country.
But when it comes to electing MPs, again, I would like to know the basic question: Why contest a constituency?
Why contest a constituency
Why would anyone or any team contest a constituency? I believe some parties have different reasons from what I feel is the right reason. I believe that in contesting for a constituency, the most important priority and motivation is to represent the residents of that particular constituency.
If the MP is not elected to represent the people of a certain geographical location with varying profiles and needs, what is he or she elected for?
I understand that in Singapore, voting is party-based and not based on individuals. This means that voters must also consider what the party represents, on top of whether the candidate is suitable to address the needs of the constituency. Nevertheless, it does not make sense to me when a party contest a constituency because the party wishes to take issue with the incumbent’s portfolio in the cabinet. In other words, I believe one should not contest a constituency simply to give voters a chance to vote the incumbent out. The more mistaken motivation is to simply ‘let the people have a chance to vote’.
In the case of Tanjong Pagar GRC, the attempt to form a team just to allow the people to vote misses the point of what voting is for. Even if a formidable team is assembled, voters must also ask themselves why is the team here? Does the team understand our specific needs? Has the team been around to meet the people and to profile the area? Is the team able to help?
The same goes for SDP’s bid in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC and NSP’s efforts in Marine Parade GRC and Tampines GRC. To contest these GRCs so that the opposition has a chance to take aim at specific politicians and specific policies and to canvass for votes on the basis that certain incumbents should be voted out is really ignoring the equally real work that the MPs have put in to care for their residents.
I am not saying that SDP and NSP are there solely to pick on specific individuals but it appears to be the case. The constant reference for the desire to hold the ministers accountable and requests for them to answer for their decisions paints a picture that misrepresents the main aim of electing an MP. I am not saying that SDP and NSP are not interested in the welfare of the people in the constituency – I am certain they are - but I wish they would not portray their efforts as chiefly to vote out certain individuals for the national policies they represent.
As someone who feels that he is sorely outpriced in the HDB resale market and do not find the locations of BTOs appealing, of course I am concerned about the cost of public housing. As someone who thought the YOG was a success, I am also concerned over the reason for over-budgeting. Similarly, I find it shocking that someone could escape from a detention center and flee the country even as many units are tasked to comb Singapore for someone that has already left the country.
But when it comes to electing MPs, again, I would like to know the basic question: Why contest a constituency?
→ 2 Comments
Posted in a view of mine that will be drowned out by global commentary